TOPIC: Benchmarks

Benchmarks 9 years 9 months ago #5854

Unfortunately the data doesn't have starting year or # of player in company so I can't filter by that.

I appreciate your fixes for #1 and #29, I'll edit the table.

#9 seems to have a wide range of times - I checked the data and the calculations seems right, there were 1775 games and only 80 (5%) were under 3 hours and I'm excluding them as "extreme" times. When I include them the top 12% time 3:27 - still too high?

I meant to include 31/33 in the table:



31	2:05	1:39	1:26

32	Sample size too small (only 18 games in the data)

33	1:59	1:40	1:30

I hadn't though about the multi-climate ones.. climate isn't mentioned in the data I have so I can't break them down by climate. Might be in another table in the database (Frank..?), otherwise we might have to leave them out/make up times?

Tobus
Topic Author
Offline
Junior Member
Posts: 38
Thank you received: 19

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Last edit: by Tobus. Reason: Forgot to talk about multi-climate servers

Benchmarks 9 years 9 months ago #5859

Yes, indeed it's in a different table in the database. When i have some time again i will get the data to you Tobus! Don't expect it to soon though, something major has changed in my private life (daughter is born ) See you soon!	Frank Offline Administrator Posts: 777 Thank you received: 407
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Benchmarks 9 years 8 months ago #5871

Hi Tobus,

Just FYI: Last night a change has been installed on the servers which from now on registers the starting year for all companies. Hopefully within a few weeks / months there is a fair amount of data to work with, but only from this date off course :-)

Anyway, just wanted to let you know that your suggestion is now implemented and recording!

Frank
Server Admin

The following user(s) said Thank You: ST2, tomb, Shinrei

Frank
Offline
Administrator
Posts: 777
Thank you received: 407

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Benchmarks 9 years 8 months ago #5876

Cool! Thanks Frank	Tobus Topic Author Offline Junior Member Posts: 38 Thank you received: 19
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Benchmarks 8 years 8 months ago #6473

Well it's been a year and Frank has kindly given me the game results with the starting year included. So here are the benchmarks for games that were started within the first year (about 12 months of data).

Code:

Server	Average	Good	Expert
2:47	2:09	1:43
8:29	7:01	5:56
1:41	1:19	1:07
3:07	2:32	2:05
6:45	5:02	3:56
1:34	1:12	1:02
1:59	1:38	1:28
1:45	1:22	1:09
5:19	4:05	3:17
3:25	2:28	1:52
3:28	2:12	1:46
1:00	0:51	0:47
0:55	0:48	0:44
2:02	1:24	1:10
2:17	1:34	1:18
15:32	12:58	11:19
1:57	1:39	1:30
2:49	2:21	2:07
0:59	0:52	0:49
1:13	0:56	0:50
1:39	1:20	1:14
1:59	1:29	1:20
2:20	1:41	1:28
1:59	1:20	1:11
2:48	2:10	1:47
1:50	1:27	1:15
2:26	1:07	0:40
2:12	1:50	1:38

As like last time, "Average" is roughly the top 50% of games, "Good" is top 25% and "Expert" is top 12%. The figures for the servers I play on look pretty fair, but let me know if something looks wrong to you.

The following user(s) said Thank You: Frank, ST2, tomb, HCL

Tobus
Topic Author
Offline
Junior Member
Posts: 38
Thank you received: 19

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Last edit: by Tobus.

Benchmarks 8 years 8 months ago #6474

Thanks Tobus Again: GREAT work Just a sidenote: Some servers changed during the last 12 months and are not representative for times. But most of the servers stayed the way they were for the whole year which shows a good average Thanks!	Frank Offline Administrator Posts: 777 Thank you received: 407
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

▴

Page::
1
2
3

■ Forum ▸ General Server Talk ▸ Suggestions & Feedback ▸ Benchmarks

Time to create page: 0.134 seconds